Unexplained Wealth Orders Regime Explained

Unexplained Wealth Orders regime and new disclosure powers for use in money laundering investigations that regulators will receive.

Unexplained Wealth Orders: Explain

An Unexplained Wealth Order (UWO) is an order granted by the High Court at the application of an enforcement authority relating to the specific property.
A UWO requires the respondent to provide a statement setting out the nature and extent of their interest in the property and how they obtained the property (in particular how it was paid for).
As the legislation stands, a UWO may only be granted where the court is satisfied that there are “reasonable grounds for suspecting that the known sources of the respondent’s lawfully obtained income would have been insufficient” to allow the respondent to obtain the specified property.
A UWO may only be issued to
1. (i) A politically exposed person (PEP);
2. (ii) Where the court has reasonable grounds to suspect that the Respondent is, or has been, involved in serious crime; or
3. (iii) where a person connected with the Respondent has been involved in serious crime.
4. For these purposes, the Bill tracks

the definition of PEP in the Fourth Anti-Money Laundering Directive

Expanded Definition of Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs): The Fourth revision expanded the definition of a PEP to include those individuals who hold a prominent position of power. Even when an individual ceases to be a PEP, they will now still be deemed as one for 12 months after relinquishing their position. Additionally, the fourth AML Directive now includes domestic PEPs. If you are dealing with any director or CEO of a large international company, you need to know about this change.

and

that of ‘serious crime’ in the Serious Crime Act 2007.

UWOs will have retrospective effect in that they can be issued in respect of property acquired before the date on which the Criminal Finances Bill will eventually come into force. Neither the property nor the individual subject to a UWO need be based in the UK.

A failure to respond to a UWO creates a presumption that the property in question is recoverable in civil proceedings. The Bill provides that a criminal offence be committed if a respondent gives a false or misleading statement in response to a UWO, with a maximum penalty of two years’ imprisonment. Information disclosed under a UWO can only be used in criminal proceedings in limited circumstances (e.g. where the response differs to other evidence given by the respondent).

How do Unexplained Wealth Orders impact my firm?

The focus of Unexplained Wealth Orders is on individuals, not corporates. Nonetheless, financial services practitioners will want to keep an eye on their implementation.
1. Firstly, while UWOs are likely to be used primarily as a tool to expose illicit wealth, tax evasion or corruption, it is interesting to note that (along with the SFO, HMRC and NCA) the FCA has been granted the power to apply for such an order. The FCA will most likely use them about insider dealing investigations.
2. Secondly, UWOs will be of significance to a firm’s private clients. To support the Unexplained Wealth Orders regime a court may grant interim freezing orders in respect of property subject to a UWO.
3. Undoubtedly, financial services firms will be on the receiving end of such injunctions. Moreover, given the vast extraterritorial scope of UWOs, a client with little or no UK connection may be surprised to find themselves and their property subject to such an order.

Additional disclosure powers

It is also worth flagging that the Criminal Finances Bill provides for disclosure orders to be used in money laundering investigations. Such orders are already available in confiscation and fraud proceedings. A disclosure order may be served on a third party (such as a bank) to compel the disclosure of relevant information. Information supplied by an individual or firm under a disclosure order cannot be used against them in criminal proceedings.
Again, the impact of these new powers will depend on how enthusiastically regulators seek disclosure orders. One can imagine UK regulated financial services firms being viewed as a comparatively easy source of information (compared to non-UK based individuals) in money laundering investigations.

What next?